Prescription of off-label and unlicensed medication for newborns hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit / Prescrição de medicamentos off-label e não licenciados para neonatos hospitalizados na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the prevalence of off-label and unlicensed prescriptions for a population of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in a hospital in southern Santa Catarina. Methods: Observational study with a cross-sectional design. All neonates admitted to the Intensive Care Unit during the period from March 2020 to March 2021 were included. Data collection was performed through a questionnaire made by the authors and the classification of drugs based on the Electronic Drug Description (Bulário Eletrônico) of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency and Drug Dex-Micromedex. Results: Data from 296 neonates were evaluated. The prevalence was 50,7% for prescribing off-label medications and 37,2% for unlicensed medications. The use of drugs was higher in preterm neonates, with low birth weight, 1st minute Apgar between 6-8, 5th minute Apgar between 7-8, and in need of invasive procedures. The most used off-label drugs were ampicillin, gentamicin and fentanyl (92.6, 92.0 and 26.6%, respectively), whereas the most used unlicensed drugs were caffeine, phenobarbital and bromopride (78.1, 16.3 and 10.9%, respectively). Conclusions: This study showed a large percentage of prescriptions made in the off-label (50.7%) and unlicensed (37.2%) form in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, corroborating the worrying world scenario. The most exposed neonates were precisely the most vulnerable ones and, among the most commonly prescribed medications, ampicillin and gentamicin stood out in off-label form and caffeine in unlicensed form.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar a prevalência de prescrições off-label e não licenciadas uma população de neonatos internados na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal em um hospital ao sul de Santa Catarina. Métodos: Estudo observacional com delineamento transversal. Foram incluídos todos os neonatos admitidos na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva durante o período de março de 2020 a março de 2021. A coleta de dados foi realizada a partir de questionário elaborado pelos autores, e a classificação dos medicamentos, com base no Bulário Eletrônico da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária e no Drug Dex-Micromedex. Resultados: Foram avaliados dados de 296 neonatos. A prevalência foi de 50,7% para prescrição de medicações off-label e 37,2% para medicações não licenciadas. O uso dos fármacos foi maior em neonatos pré-termo, com baixo peso ao nascer, Apgar de 1o minuto entre 6-8, Apgar de 5o minuto entre 7-8, e com necessidade de procedimentos invasivos. Os fármacos off-label mais utilizados foram a ampicilina, gentamicina e fentanil (92,6, 92 e 26,6%, respectivamente), já os fármacos não licenciados mais utilizados foram a cafeína, fenobarbital e bromoprida (78,1, 16,3 e 10,9%, respectivamente). Conclusões: O estudo demonstrou grande porcentagem de prescrições realizadas de forma off-label (50,7%) e não licenciada (37,2%) na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal de análise, corroborando o preocupante cenário mundial. Os neonatos mais expostos foram justamente aqueles mais vulneráveis e, entre as medicações mais utilizadas, destacam-se a ampicilina e a gentamicina de modo off-label e a cafeína de modo não licenciado.

Naltrexona em baixa dose (LDN): tendência de consumo nas capitais brasileiras e Distrito Federal, 2014-2020 / Low-dose naltrexone (LDN): consumption trend in Brazilian capitals and the Federal District, 2014-2020

Resumo Estudo ecológico com objetivo de determinar o consumo de naltrexona em baixa dose (LDN) nas 26 capitais brasileiras e Distrito Federal e acompanhar a tendência entre os anos de 2014 e 2020. A coleta de dados da dispensação de naltrexona manipulada, se deu por meio do Sistema Nacional de Gerenciamento de Produtos Controlados, publicizado em 2020, considerando-se baixa dose prescrições de até 5 mg. O cálculo dos coeficientes de dispensação utilizou as estimativas populacionais do Instituto Brasileiro de Pesquisa Geografia e Estatística. Utilizou-se análise estatística descritiva e de regressão generalizada de Prais-Winsten para a série temporal. As tendências observadas foram classificadas em crescentes, estáveis ou decrescentes, com intervalo de confiança de 95% e nível de significância de 5%. Os resultados demonstraram maiores coeficientes de consumo de LDN nas regiões Centro-Oeste, Sul e Sudeste e menores nas Norte e Nordeste. Observou-se dispensação de LDN crescente em 55,6% das capitais, estacionária em 44,4% e ausência de coeficientes decrescentes. Apesar das evidências limitadas quanto à farmacoterapia de LDN e da sua prescrição off-label, os dados demonstram que a prescrição, dispensação e consumo vem crescendo no Brasil, com ênfase nas regiões centro-sul do país.

Abstract The scope of this paper is an ecological study to determine the consumption of low-dose naltrexone (LDN) in the 26 Brazilian capitals and the Federal District and monitor the trend between the years 2014 to 2020. Data collection on the dispensation of manipulated naltrexone was done through the National Management System of Controlled Products, published in 2020, considering low-dose prescriptions of up to 5 mg. The calculation of the dispensation coefficients used the population estimates of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Descriptive statistical analysis and generalized Prais-Winsten regression analysis were used for the time series analysis. The trends observed were classified as increasing, stable, or decreasing, with a 95% confidence interval and 5% significance level. The results showed higher LDN consumption coefficients in the Mid-West, South and Southeast regions and lower coefficients in the North and Northeast. Increasing dispensation of LDN was observed in 55.6% of the capitals, being stationary in 44.4%, with no decreasing coefficients. Despite the limited evidence regarding LDN pharmacotherapy and its off-label prescription, the data show that prescription, dispensing, and consumption have been on the increase in Brazil, with emphasis on the central-south regions of the country.

Utilización de medicamentos off-label y unlicensed en una unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos de un hospital de alta complejidad español. Estudio descriptivo / Off-label and unlicensed drug use in a pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care Spanish hospital. A descriptive study

Introducción. En las unidades de cuidados intensivos pediátricos, se utiliza gran cantidad de medicamentos, muchos prescritos fuera de las condiciones establecidas en su ficha técnica (prescripciones off-label y unlicensed). El objetivo de este estudio fue describir el uso de medicamentos y estimar la prevalencia de fármacos off-label y unlicensed en una unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos de un hospital de tercer nivel español. Población y métodos. Estudio transversal, observacional, de una cohorte de niños ingresados en una unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos. El estudio se llevó a cabo en 2017. Se revisó cada fármaco prescrito, sus condiciones de uso y administración. Además, se analizaron las fichas técnicas de los fármacos implicados con la finalidad de identificar si el uso de los medicamentos se realizaba según sus condiciones de autorización, o bien se hacía fuera de prospecto (off-label) o como unlicensed. Resultados. La muestra fue de 97 pacientes. El 74,2 % (n = 72) de los pacientes recibieron algún fármaco off-label o unlicensed. El 23,8 % (n = 243) de las prescripciones fueron off-label y el 8,7 % (n = 89), unlicensed. El subanálisis realizado por grupos de edad mostró que el grupo de edad que recibió mayor número de prescripciones totales (n = 611) y el mayor porcentaje de fármacos prescritos en condiciones off-label y/o unlicensed (38,4 %) fue el de menores de 2 años. Conclusiones. La prescripción de fármacos off-label y/o unlicensed es una práctica habitual en la unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos. Este estudio permite documentar la complejidad de la terapéutica en niños.

Introduction. In pediatric intensive care units, a large number of drugs are used, many of which are prescribed for condition beyond those established in their summary of product characteristics (off-label and unlicensed drug prescriptions). The objective of this study was to describe drug use and estimate the prevalence of off-label and unlicensed drugs in a pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care Spanish hospital. Population and methods. Cross-sectional, observational study with a single cohort of children admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit. The study was conducted in 2017. Each drug prescription, its conditions of use and administration were reviewed. In addition, the summary of product characteristics of drugs used were analyzed in order to identify whether they were used according to their conditions of authorization, or whether they were used in an off-label or unlicensed manner. Results. The sample included 97 patients. At least one off-label or unlicensed drug was administered to 74.2% (n = 72) of patients; 23.8% (n = 243) corresponded to off-label prescriptions and 8.7% (n = 89), unlicensed prescriptions. A sub-analysis by age group showed that the age group that received a higher number of total prescriptions (n = 611) and a higher percentage of off-label and/or unlicensed drug prescriptions (38.4%) was under 2 years of age. Conclusions. Off-label and/or unlicensed drug prescription is a common practice in the pediatric intensive care unit. This study allowed us to document the complexity of therapeutics in children.

The off-label use of antimicrobial medications in neonatal intensive care unit / 中华实用儿科临床杂志

Off-lable use of antimicrobial medications in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) draws wide attention of medical professionals both abroad and inside China.The objective of this study is to give a commentary of off-label use of antimicrobial medications in NICU.There are 4 sections in this study: the causes, current status, management flow chart, and meditation of off-lable use of antimicrobial medications in NICU.

Current Status of Off-label Use of Denosumab in Bone Tumor and Bone Diseases / 肿瘤防治研究

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) ligand (RANKL) that significantly inhibits osteoclast activity and has been approved to treat osteoporosis, giant cell tumor of bone, and prophylactic as well as therapeutic entities for bone metastasis. However, the imbalance of RANKL/RANK/OPG has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of several other rare bone diseases and tumor-like disorders, including aneurysmal bone cyst, fibrous dysplasia of bone, and Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Nevertheless, there have been various clinical reports although these diseases have not been approved for indications. The review aims to summarize the available evidence for the off-label use of denosumab in metabolic bone diseases and tumor-like disorders and provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Uso de antiepilépticos en niños hospitalizados en el Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell / Use of antiepileptic drugs in children hospitalized at the Pereira Rossell Pediatric Hospital / Uso de drogas antiepilépticas em crianças internadas no Hospital Pediátrico Pereira Rossell

Introducción: indicaciones off label, estrecho margen terapéutico, variabilidad farmacocinética, interacciones farmacológicas constituyen algunos de los problemas a abordar en el uso crónico de antiepilépticos (AE). Caracterizar su perfil de uso es necesario para promover su prescripción racional. Objetivo: Describir el perfil de uso de AE en menores de 15 años hospitalizados en el Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell entre 1/07/2020 y 31/12/2020. Material y método: estudio descriptivo, de menores de 15 años hospitalizados en cuidados moderados en tratamiento con AE. Variables: tipo y número de AE, motivo de la indicación, vía de administración, dosis, uso asociado con psicofármacos, adherencia. Resultados: recibían AE 113 pacientes, mediana edad 7 años, 50,4% sexo femenino. Motivo de la indicación: epilepsia (grupo A) 50,4% y otras patologías (grupo B) 49,6%. Mediana de edad: 2,7 años grupo A vs. 11,5 años grupo B. El AE más indicado fue levetiracetam en el grupo A (35%) y ácido valproico en el grupo B (35,7%). La asociación con psicofármacos se registró en 8,7% grupo A vs. 44,6% en el grupo B. Conclusiones: predominó el uso de levetiracetam en pacientes epilépticos. La mitad de los pacientes recibieron AE para patologías diferentes a la epilepsia, mayoritariamente psiquiátricas. En este grupo predominó el uso de ácido valproico. El análisis de esta serie permite una aproximación al conocimiento del perfil de uso de AE en los niños asistidos en este centro, y por tanto de los principales problemas a abordar. Futuros estudios multicéntricos con población ambulatoria son necesarios para mejorar el conocimiento y contribuir al uso racional de los mismos.

Introduction: off-label prescription, narrow therapeutic margin, pharmacokinetic variability, drug interaction, are some of the problems to consider in the chronic use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). It is necessary to characterize their utilization profile in order to promote rational prescription. Objective: to describe the utilization profile of AEDs in children under 15 years of age hospitalized at the Pereira Rossell Pediatric Hospital from 7/01/2020 to 12/31/2020. Material and Methods: descriptive study of children under 15 years of age hospitalized in moderate care units receiving treatment with AEDs. Variables: type and number of AEDs, reason for the prescription, dose, associated use of psychotropic drugs, compliance. Results: 113 patients received AEDs, median age 7 years, 50.4% females. Reason for prescription; epi- lepsy (group A) 50.4%, other pathologies (group B) 49.6%. Median age in group A 2.7 years, versus 1.1.5 years in group B. Most frequently prescribed AEDs was levetiracetam in group A (35%) and valproic acid in group B (37,7%). Association with psychotropic drugs was present in 8.7% of group A versus 44.6% of group B. Conclusions: levetiracem use was predominant in epileptic patients. Half of the patients received AEDs for pathologies other than epilepsy, mostly psychiatric. In this group the use of valproic acid was predominant. Analysis of this series enables an approximation to the understanding of the profile of AEDs use in children assisted at this Hospital, and there- fore an approximation to the problems to be considered. Future multicenter studies with an outpatient population are necessary to expand our knowledge and to contribute to a rational use of these drugs.

Introdução: indicações off-label, margem terapêutica estreita, variabilidade farmacocinética, interações farmacológicas são alguns dos problemas a serem abordados no uso crônico de drogas antiepilépticas (EA). Caracterizar seu perfil de uso é necessário para promover sua prescrição racional. Objetivo: descrever o perfil de utilização da AE em crianças menores de 15 anos internadas no Centro Hospitalar Pereira Rossell entre 01/07/2020 e 31/12/2020. Material e Métodos: estudo descritivo de crianças menores de 15 anos internadas em cuidados moderados em tratamento de EA. Variáveis: tipo e número de EAs, motivo da indicação, via de administração, dose, uso associado a psicotrópicos, adesão. Resultados: 113 pacientes receberam EA, com meia idade de 7 anos, 50,4% do sexo feminino. Motivo da indicação: epilepsia (grupo A) 50,4% e outras patologias (grupo B) 49,6%. Mediana de idade: 2,7 anos grupo A vs. 11,5 anos grupo B. O EA mais indicado foi Levetiracetam no grupo A (35%) e ácido valpróico no grupo B (35,7%). A associação com psicotrópicos foi registrada em 8,7% do grupo A vs. 44,6% no grupo B. Conclusões: o uso de Levetiracetam em pacientes epilépticos predominou. A metade dos pacientes recebeu AE por outras patologias que não foram a epilepsia, principalmente psiquiátricas. Nesse grupo, predominou o uso do ácido valpróico. A análise desta série permite aproximar o conhecimento do perfil de uso da AE nas crianças atendidas nesse centro e, portanto, a aproximação aos principais problemas a serem abordados. Futuros estudos multicêntricos com população ambulatorial são necessários para aprimorar o conhecimento e contribuir para sua utilização racional.

Compounded medications for cardiovascular use in neonatology: an integrative review / Medicamentos manipulados de uso cardiovascular em neonatologia: uma revisão integrativa

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the profile of the compounded cardiovascular medicines prescribed in neonatology in Brazil. Data source: An integrative bibliographic review was carried out, including studies published in the last 20 years. The used descriptors were: Intensive Care Neonatal, Off-Label Use, Pharmaceutical Preparations, in the databases Virtual Health Library (VHL), PubMed, and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO). Review articles and guidelines were excluded. The quality of the evidence was analyzed, and 10 articles were selected to integrate the study. Data synthesis: The profile of routine prescrption in the neonatal unit was evaluated. The main cardiovascular medications prescribed as compounding formulation were: Spironolactone, Captopril, Furosemide, Hydrochlorothiazide, Propranolol, Amiodarone, Nifedipine, Carvedilol, Digoxin, Enalapril, Epinephrine, and Hydralazine. The drugs were obtained from adaptations of dosage forms, through the transformation of capsules or tablets into liquid formulations, as a solution, suspension, or syrup, as well as in the form of solutions prepared from active pharmaceutical ingredients. The compounding of medications made drug therapy possible in neonatology, considering that such medications do not have registration of the oral liquid dosage form in the country, despite being part of the List of Essential Medicines for Children of the Word Health Organization. Conclusions: It was possible to analyze the profile of compounded cardiovascular medicines prescribed in neonatology in Brazil. The results showed the need for the development of medications suitable for the neonatal population, and the standardization of operational procedures for preparing extemporaneous formulations in neonatology to increase drug safety.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar o perfil dos medicamentos cardiovasculares manipulados prescritos em neonatologia no Brasil. Fontes de dados: Foi realizada uma revisão bibliográfica integrativa, incluindo estudos publicados nos últimos 20 anos. As palavras-chave utilizadas foram: intensive care neonatal, off-label use, pharmaceutical preparations, nos bancos de dados da Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), PubMed e Biblioteca Eletrônica Científica Online (SciELO). Os artigos de revisão e diretrizes foram excluídos. A qualidade da evidência foi analisada, e foram selecionados 10 artigos para integrar o estudo. Síntese dos dados: Todos os estudos possibilitaram a avaliação do perfil de prescrição na rotina da unidade. Os principais fármacos cardiovasculares, prescritos em formulação extemporânea, foram espironolactona, captopril, furosemida, hidroclorotiazida, propranolol, amiodarona, nifedipina, carvedilol, digoxina, enalapril, epinefrina e hidralazina. Os medicamentos foram obtidos mediante adaptações de formas farmacêuticas, por meio da transformação de cápsulas ou comprimidos em formulações líquidas, como solução, suspensão ou xarope, assim como também na forma de soluções preparadas com base nos insumos farmacêuticos ativos. A manipulação de medicamentos tornou possível o tratamento medicamentoso em neonatologia, uma vez que tais medicamentos não possuem registro da forma farmacêutica líquida oral no país, apesar de integrarem a lista de medicamentos essenciais em pediatria da Organização Mundial da Saúde. Conclusões: Foi possível analisar o perfil dos medicamentos cardiovasculares manipulados prescritos na neonatologia no Brasil. Os resultados evidenciaram a necessidade do desenvolvimento de medicamentos adequados à população neonatal e à padronização dos procedimentos operacionais do preparo de formulações extemporâneas na neonatologia, para aumentar a segurança dos medicamentos.

Uso de antipsicóticos atípicos no tratamento da esquizofrenia no Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil: estudo de coorte, 2008-2017 / Uso de antipsicóticos atípicos en el tratamiento de la esquizofrenia en el Sistema Único de Salud de Brasil: estudio de 2008 a 2017 / Use of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia in the Brazilian National Health System: a cohort study, 2008-2017

Objective: to investigate sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of users of atypical antipsychotics receiving care via the Specialized Component of Pharmaceutical Assistance (Componente Especializado da Assistência Farmacêutica - CEAF), for the treatment of schizophrenia in Brazil, between 2008 and 2017. Methods: this was a retrospective cohort study using records of the authorizations for high complexity procedures retrieved from the Outpatient Information System of the Brazilian National Health System, from all Brazilian states. Results: of the 759,654 users, 50.5% were female, from the Southeast region (60.2%), diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia (77.6%); it could be seen a higher prevalence of the use of risperidone (63.3%) among children/adolescents; olanzapine (34.0%) in adults; and quetiapine (47.4%) in older adults; about 40% of children/adolescents were in off-label use of antipsychotics according to age; adherence to CEAF was high (82%), and abandonment within six months was 24%. Conclusion: the findings expand knowledge about the sociodemographic and clinical profile of users and highlight the practice of off-label use.

Objetivo: investigar las características sociodemográficas y clínicas de los usuarios de antipsicóticos atípicos, atendidos por el Componente Especializado de Asistencia Farmacéutica (CEAF) para el tratamiento de la esquizofrenia en Brasil, de 2008 a 2017. Métodos: estudio de cohorte retrospectivo utilizando registros de autorizaciones de trámites de alta complejidad del Sistema de Información Ambulatorio del SUS, de todos los estados brasileños. Resultados: de los 759.654 usuários identificados, el 50,5% era del sexo feminino de la región Sudeste (60,2%), diagnosticadas con esquizofrenia paranoide (77,6%). Hubo una mayor prevalencia de risperidona (63,3%) entre niños y adolescentes; de olanzapina (34,0%) en adultos; y quetiapina (47,4%) en ancianos. Alrededor del 40% de los niños/adolescentes estaba bajo uso no autorizado de antipsicóticos según la edad. La adherencia al CEAF fue alta (82%), y la deserción a los seis meses fue del 24%. Conclusión: los hallazgos amplían el conocimiento sobre el perfil sociodemográfico y clínico de los usuarios y destacan la práctica del uso off-label.

Objetivo: investigar características sociodemográficas e clínicas de usuários de antipsicóticos atípicos assistidos pelo Componente Especializado da Assistência Farmacêutica (CEAF), para tratamento da esquizofrenia no Brasil, de 2008 a 2017. Métodos: estudo de coorte retrospectivo utilizando registros das autorizações de procedimentos de alta complexidade do Sistema de Informações Ambulatoriais do Sistema Único de Saúde, de todos os estados brasileiros. Resultados: dos 759.654 usuários, 50,5% eram do sexo feminino, da região Sudeste (60,2%), diagnosticados com esquizofrenia paranoide (77,6%); observou-se maior prevalência de uso da risperidona (63,3%) entre crianças/adolescentes; de olanzapina (34,0%), em adultos; e quetiapina (47,4%), nos idosos; cerca de 40% das crianças/ adolescentes estavam sob uso off-label de antipsicóticos segundo a idade; a adesão ao CEAF foi alta (82%), e o abandono em seis meses foi de 24%. Conclusão: os achados ampliam o conhecimento sobre perfil sociodemográfico e clínico dos usuários e destacam a prática do uso off-label.

Prevalence of Ivermectin use to prevent COVID-19 during the pandemic in Mato Grosso: cross-sectional home-based study / Prevalência do uso de ivermectina para prevenir COVID-19 durante a pandemia em Mato Grosso: estudo transversal de base domiciliar

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the use of ivermectin as COVID-19 prevention method by the population of Mato Grosso in 2020. Methods: This is a home-based survey, carried out between September and October 2020, in 10 pole cities of the socioeconomic regions of State. The use of ivermectin was evaluated through the question: "Did you take ivermectin to prevent COVID-19?". Sociodemographic variables (sex, age group, education, family income), current work situation, being benefitted by government financial programs, as well as symptoms, seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, and previous diagnosis of COVID-19 were evaluated. Prevalence and their associations were estimated using the chi-square test. Results: 4.206 individuals were evaluated for prevalence of ivermectin use; 58.3% of the individuals responded positively, this rate being higher in the municipalities of the western region of the state (66.6%). There was no significant difference between sexes, but the prevalence was higher among people aged 50-59 years (69.7%), who were white (66.5%), with complete higher education or more (68.8%) and higher family income (≥3 minimum wages-64.2%). The use of this drug was even higher among participants who considered their knowledge of the disease good or very good (65.0%), who reported having symptoms of COVID-19 (75.3%), and who had been previously diagnosed with the disease (91.2%). Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of use of ivermectin as a method to prevent covid-19 by the population of Mato Grosso, indicating the need for strategies to inform the population about the risks of off-label use of drugs and to combat the advertising of drugs that are ineffective against COVID-19.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar a utilização de ivermectina como prevenção da COVID-19 pela população de Mato Grosso em 2020. Métodos: Trata-se de um inquérito de base domiciliar, realizado entre setembro e outubro de 2020, em dez municípios-polos das regiões socioeconômicas do estado. O uso da ivermectina foi avaliado por meio da pergunta: "Tomou ivermectina para prevenir a COVID-19?". Foram avaliadas as variáveis sociodemográficas (sexo, faixa etária, escolaridade, renda familiar), a situação de trabalho atual, o recebimento de benefícios financeiros governamentais, bem como sintomas, a soroprevalência de anticorpos contra SARS-CoV-2 e o diagnóstico prévio de COVID-19. As estimativas de prevalência e suas associações foram realizadas por meio do teste χ2. Resultados: Foram analisados 4.206 indivíduos, e a prevalência de uso de ivermectina foi de 58,3%, sendo maior nos municípios da região Oeste (66,6%). Não houve diferença significativa entre os sexos, a prevalência foi maior na da faixa etária de 50-59 anos (69,7%), em pessoas brancas (66,5%), com ensino superior completo ou mais (68,8%) e maior renda familiar (≥3 salários-mínimos — 64,2%). A utilização do medicamento ainda foi maior entre os que consideraram seu conhecimento sobre a doença como bom ou muito bom (65,0%), entre os que referiram ter apresentado sintomas de COVID-19 (75,3%) e que foram diagnosticados com a doença previamente (91,2%). Conclusão: Verifica-se a elevada a prevalência do uso de ivermectina para a prevenção da COVID-19 pela população de Mato Grosso, indicando a necessidade de estratégias para informar a população sobre os riscos do uso off-label de medicamentos e combater a publicidade de medicamentos sem eficácia contra COVID-19.

Analysis on Ethical Issues in Off-label Use of Antitumor Drugs / 中国医学伦理学

The phenomenon of off-label use of antitumor drugs in the treatment of malignant tumors is relatively common. Although it is conducive to the development of clinical medical practice, but it is still necessary to pay attention to ethical issues such as medication risks and inadequate implementation of informed consent. Therefore, to effectively avoid ethical risks and standardize the rational use of off-label antitumor drugs, this paper proposed that pharmacists should actively participate in the process of off-label use of antitumor drugs, improve the evidence level of evidence-based medicine, implement patients’ right to informed consent, and improve the hospital’s supervision system of off-label drug use, so as to ensure the reasonable and legal use of drugs by patients.

Expert consensus on off-label drug use in the three Northeastern provinces of China（solid tumors and hematology） / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To provide theoretical basis for the rational use of drugs in medical institutions， assist in improving the quality of pharmaceutical services， and thus meet clinical drug demands. METHODS Adopting consensus meetings， Liaoning Pharmaceutical Association，Jilin Pharmaceutical Association and Heilongjiang Pharmaceutical Association collaborated with clinical and pharmaceutical experts in the region to compile the expert consensus on off-label drug use in the three Northeastern provinces of China after many votes and discussions by collecting and collating the information related to off-label drug use in medical institutions from the three northeastern provinces of China，and referring to and citing off-label drug use stated in some expert consensus and medication catalog. RESULTS Finally， a total of 198 pieces of off-label drug use information for 70 drugs were included in the two sections of solid tumors and hematological diseases in Consensus of Experts on Drug Use beyond the Instructions in the Three Provinces of Northeast China. CONCLUSIONS Consensus of Experts on Off-label Drug Use in the Three Northeastern Provinces of Northeast China （solid tumors and hematology）offers a theoretical foundation for rational drug use in the treatment of solid tumors and hematological diseases within medical institutions，and has a positive significance in improving the effectiveness and safety of drug treatment.

Treatment strategy of calciphylaxis in dialysis patients / 中华肾脏病杂志

Calciphylaxis is a vascular disease caused by a combination of multiple factors, and the calcified ischemic lesion results in the severe skin damage accompanied by unbearable pain. Calciphylaxis tends to occur in patients with end-stage renal disease, and the treatment of this disease faces enormous challenges. Current treatment recommendations are mainly based on clinical experience and observational research reports, and there is still a lack of clinical practice standards or consensus for managing calciphylaxis. Therefore, this paper will review the effective treatment methods and off-label use of calciphylaxis based on literature reports, providing reference for the clinical treatment of the disease.

Pattern Of Prescription And Utilization Of Off-Label And Unlicensed Drugs Among Pediatric Patients Attending Outpatients Department Of Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital Of Gujarat State

Objectives: To determine the pattern of prescription and utilization of off-label and unlicensed drugs among pediatric patients attending outpatients department of tertiary care teaching hospital of Gujarat state. AMethods: prospective study was conducted for 6 months among 140 pediatric patients attending outpatient department of Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society Medical College, Dharpur, Patan. The demographic details and complete prescription were noted in predesigned form. The off-label drugs were categorized by using National Formulary of India. Off-label drugs were classified by using Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification. Out of 481Results: drugs prescribed, the pattern of distribution of off-label and unlicensed drugs were 215(44.7%) and 3(0.6%) respectively. Majority (n=151, 70.2%) of off-label drugs prescribed among 1-12 years age group. Most of off-label drugs were prescribed for indication of respiratory system (68%). The findings of this study showed a highConclusion: incidence of off-label prescribing mainly antibiotics for respiratory disease

Use of tigecycline at a teaching hospital / Uso da tigeciclina em hospital de ensino

INTRODUCTION: Tigecycline is an antimicrobial agent, approved for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections, hospital-acquired and community-acquired pneumonia, intra-abdominal infections and anaerobic or atypical infections. OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of tigecycline in a teaching hospital and to compare data from patients who had their prescriptions audited by the hospital infection committee with those who did not have audited prescriptions. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study conducted at a teaching hospital from April 2012 to March 2014 including patients who received tigecycline. Demographic variables, comorbidities, microbiological findings, prescribed antibiotics and technical opinions issued by the Hospital Infection Control Service were collected. RESULTS: 71 patients were included, aged between 13 and 92 years, 63.4% were male and 56.3% were non-white. Tigecycline was the first antimicrobial choice in 19.7% (14/71) of the cases, while the use associated with other antibiotics was observed in 66.2% (45/71) of the prescriptions. mainly with meropenem (28.9%). Empirical use was performed in 69.0% of cases, after culture and the antibiogram in 31.0% and off label use in 81.7%. The microorganisms frequently identified by the culture tests were Enterococcus faecalis (17.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.7%) and Klebsiella penumoniae (11.8%). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that empirical and off label use is common in clinical practice and few prescriptions were guided by the results of the culture and the antibiogram, demonstrating the need for prescribers to evaluate the benefits/ risks of using this antibiotic, risk of resistance, adverse effects and drug interactions, in addition to cost.

INTRODUÇÃO: A tigeciclina é agente antimicrobiano, aprovada para o tratamento de infecções complicadas na pele e tecidos moles, pneumonia hospitalar e adquirida na comunidade, infecções intra-abdominal e infecções anaeróbias ou atípicas. OBJETIVO: Descrever o uso da tigeciclina em hospital de ensino e comparar dados de pacientes que tiveram suas prescrições auditadas pela comissão de infecção hospitalar com os que não tiveram prescrições auditadas. MÉTODOS: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo observacional realizado em hospital de ensino de abril de 2012 a março de 2014 incluindo pacientes que receberam tigeciclina. Foram coletadas variáveis ​​demográficas, comorbidades, achados microbiológicos, antibióticos prescritos e pareceres técnicos emitidos pelo Serviço de Controle de Infecção Hospitalar. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 71 pacientes, com idade entre 13 e 92 anos, 63,4% eram do sexo masculino e 56,3% eram não brancos. A tigeciclina foi primeira escolha antimicrobiana em 19,7% (14/71) dos casos, enquanto o uso associado a outros antibióticos foi observado em 66,2% (45/71) das prescrições. principalmente com meropenem (28,9%). O uso empírico foi realizado em 69,0% dos casos, após cultura e o antibiograma em 31,0% e o uso off label em 81,7%. Os microrganismos frequentemente identificados pelos testes de cultura foram Enterococcus faecalis (17,6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14,7%) e Klebsiella penumoniae (11,8%). CONCLUSÃO: O estudo demonstrou que o uso empírico e off label é comum na prática clínica e poucas prescrições foram orientadas pelos resultados da cultura e do antibiograma, demonstrando necessidade de prescritores avaliarem os benefícios/riscos do uso desse antibiótico, risco de resistência, efeitos adversos e interações medicamentosas, além do custo.

Recommendations on off-label antibiotics use in PICU / 中国小儿急救医学

Off-label antibiotics use in pediatric intensive care unit is not rare.Off-label antibiotics use is due to indication, age, dosage, frequency, route and method of administration, course of treatment, etc.It is necessary and reasonable for off-label antibiotics use in clinical practice, but there are also some risks.Off-label antibiotics use in clinical practice should follow the corresponding principles and standardized management.Drug treatment decisions should always be made on the basis that the individual child would be ultimately benefit.

Correlation analysis between the judgment of medical damage liability disputes related to off-label drug use and evidence-based evidence / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To explore wheth er there is a relationship between the judgment results of medical damage liability disputes related to off-label drug use and evidence-based evidence. METHODS By searching for medical damage liability disputes related to off-label drug use up to 2021 on pkulaw.cn ，documents were extracted to record objective factors ，subjective factors and judgment results ；whether there was evidence-based evidence was judged according to Off-label Drug Use List and Evidence-based Evaluation Standards for Off-label Drug Use of Guangdong Pharmaceutical Association ；univariate analysis was adopted to test the relationship between the judgment results and evidence-based evidence. RESULTS A total of 57 cases were included. Cases mainly occurred in the eastern China （63.2％）and tertiary hospitals （64.9％），the main appraisal agency was the appraisal center or institute（61.4％），and the most common type of off-label drug use was overdose drug use （45.6％）. Among the judgment results ， 23 cases（40.4％）of off-label drug use had a causal relationship with medical damage ，most of the responsibility of doctors was secondary responsibility （28.1％），and the actual compensation amount of the most cases were less than 100，000 yuan（54.4％）. There were 25 cases（43.9％）with evidence-based evidence. Univariate analysis found that for off-label drug use the claim amount of the case with evidence-based evidence was significantly higher than that of the case without evidence-based evidence （P＝ 0.040），and there was no significant correlation between evidence-based evidence and the actual compensation amount of the case （P＝0.741），causality determination （P＝0.256），liability type （P＝0.598）or appraisal agency （P≥0.260）. CONCLUSIONS There is no significant correlation between the judgment results of medical damage liability disputes related to off-label drug use and evidence-based evidence ，indicating that there may be certain differences between judicial trials and medical science. The off-label drug use should be regulated by establishing a complete off-label drug use management system and standardizing informed consent procedure for off-label drug use. 1610307322@pku.edu.cn

Medicamentos off-label e não licenciados no âmbito pediátrico: uma revisão descritiva dos últimos dez anos / Off-label and unlicensed drugs in the pediatric field: a descriptive review of the last ten years

A falta de medicamentos contendo bulas prevendo o tratamento de pacientes pediátricos representa um problema frequentemente observado em hospitais, principalmente nos setores de unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) pediátrica e neonatais. Sabe-se que, para que um tratamento seja considerado seguro e eficaz, uma série de estudos clínicos são necessários, no entanto, relata-se um baixo número dessas pesquisas envolvendo crianças, principalmente devido a questões éticas que dificultam a condução das mesmas. Assim, poucos são os medicamentos que provam ser adequados para o tratamento desses pacientes, tornando necessário recorrer ao uso de medicamentos off-label e não licenciados. Os medicamentos são classificados como off-label quando seu uso se dá de maneira que difere de suas especificações aprovadas, por sua vez, produtos não licenciados são classificados desta forma por não possuírem aprovação para sua comercialização no país ou não possuírem comprovação de segurança e eficácia. O preparo de protocolos de estudo organizados, relato de informações aos pais e à criança de maneira clara e objetiva, aproximação entre pesquisadores e pais para o estabelecimento de uma relação de confiança e a condução das pesquisas em momentos de disponibilidade da família demonstram-se estratégias importantes para facilitar a realização dos ensaios clínicos.

The lack of medicines containing drug information leaflets considering the treatment of pediatric patients is a problem frequently observed in hospitals, especially in the pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) sectors. It is known that, for a treatment to be considered safe and effective, a series of clinical studies are necessary; however, a low number of these studies involving children are reported, mainly due to ethical issues that make conducting them difficult. Thus, few drugs prove to be suitable for treating these patients, making it necessary to resort to using off-label and unlicensed drugs. Drugs are classified as off-label when their use differs from their approved specifications, in turn, unlicensed products are classified in this way due to not having approval for marketing in the country or do not have proof of safety and efficacy. Preparation of organized study protocols, reporting information to parents and the child in a clear and objective way, bringing researchers and parents closer to establish a relationship of trust and conducting research at moments when the family is available are important strategies to facilitate conducting clinical trials.

Off-label drug use in an adult intensive care unit of a Brazilian hospital

Abstract The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and describe the factors associated with off-label drug use in an adult intensive care unit (ICU) of a Brazilian hospital. An analytical, cross-sectional, prospective study was conducted in the adult ICU population from March 2018 to May 2018. Off-label use of medication was classified by indication, dosage, route of administration, type and volume of diluent, and duration of administration. Most patients were female (57.89%), non-elderly (56.14%), and had a mean age of 54.44 ± 17.15 years. The prevalence of off-label drug use was 70.31%, but was not associated with the clinical severity of the patients. A statistically significant association was observed between label use of drugs and prescribing potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM). The most common reasons for off-label drug use were therapeutic indication (19.58%) and volume of diluent (23.30%). Drug administration by enteral tubes accounted for the largest number of off-label uses due to route of administration (90.85%). There was a higher prevalence of off-label use of systemic antimicrobials (14.44%) and norepinephrine (9.28%). Our study provided a broad characterization of off-label drug use in an adult ICU and showed why it is important for health professionals to evaluate the specific risks and benefits of this practice

Percepções e uso do metilfenidato entre universitários da área da Saúde em Ceilândia, DF, Brasil / Perceptions and use of methylphenidate among health students in Ceilândia, DF, Brazil / Percepciones y uso del metilfenidato entre universitarios del área de la salud en Ceilândia, Distrito Federal - DF, Brasil

As percepções e o uso de metilfenidato entre universitários foram investigados em estudo descritivo realizado em duas etapas. A primeira, quantitativa, foi realizada por meio do preenchimento de um questionário semiestruturado on-line. Para a segunda etapa, qualitativa, foi realizado um grupo focal. Dos 337 participantes da primeira etapa, 14,5% relataram usar o metilfenidato. Entre os usuários, a prevalência de uso sem prescrição foi maior para o sexo masculino (65,3%), após ingresso na faculdade (57,1%), e 61,2% relataram eventos adversos. O principal motivo de uso foi o doping intelectual (65,3%). Já na etapa qualitativa, além de reforçar os achados anteriores, foram identificados tópicos temáticos como a pressão externa exercida por familiares, sociedade e a rotina universitária. Esses achados apontam para a necessidade de medidas de apoio e orientação aos universitários e de reformulação do processo ensino-aprendizagem.(AU)

This descriptive study investigated the use and perceptions of methylphenidate among university students. The study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage (quantitative), the students completed an online semi-structured questionnaire. The second stage (qualitative) consisted of focus group discussions. Of the 337 participants in the first stage, 14.5% reported using methylphenidate. The prevalence of methylphenidate use without a prescription was greater among men (65.3%) and after starting university (57.1%); 61.2% of the students reported adverse events. The main reason for using the drug was intellectual doping (65.3%). In the qualitative stage, which reinforced the findings of the quantitative stage, we identified themes such as external pressure from family, society and university routine. The findings underline the need to provide student support and advice and reformulate the teaching and learning process.(AU)

Se investigaron las percepciones y el uso del metilfenidato entre universitarios, en un estudio descriptivo realizado en dos etapas. La primera, cuantitativa, se realizó por medio del llenado de un cuestionario semiestructurado online. Para la segunda etapa, cualitativa, se realizó un grupo focal. De los 337 participantes de la primera etapa, el 14,5% relató que usaba metilfenidato. Entre los usuarios, la prevalencia de uso sin prescripción fue mayor para el sexo masculino (65,3%), después del ingreso en la facultad (57,1%) y el 61,2% relataron eventos adversos. El principal motivo de uso fue el dopping intelectual (65,3%). En la etapa cualitativa, además de reforzar los hallazgos anteriores, se identificaron tópicos temáticos tales como la presión externa ejercida por los familiares, la sociedad y la rutina universitaria. Esos hallazgos señalan la necesidad de medidas de apoyo y orientación a los universitarios y de reformulación del proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje.(AU)

Preservation of hearing in partial deafness patients who received two different regimes of corticosteroid therapy following cochlear implantation: one-year observations

Abstract The objective of this study was to assess how different modes of steroid therapy affect hearing preservation in Partial Deafness Treatment group of patients. In this study, the group consisted of 46 (24 women, 22 men; aged 18-78 years) cochlear implant patients divided into 3 subgroups. In the first subgroup (N = 13), patients underwent standard intravenous (IV) steroid therapy following implantation. In the second (N = 16), patients underwent prolonged treatment with a combination of oral and IV corticosteroids. Third subgroup (N = 17) was a control group who received no steroids therapy. The mean hearing preservation rate was 52.1% (SD = 36.7) in patients receiving standard steroid therapy, 71.4% (SD = 22.7) in patients with prolonged steroid therapy, and 22.1% (SD = 33.9) in control patients. The smallest variation of hearing preservation rate was observed in patients with prolonged steroid therapy and was 9.9 dB. In comparison, the mean change in patients with standard steroid therapy was 11.7 dB and for control patients the figure was 18.0 dB. A combination of intravenous and oral steroid therapy seems to be optimal and stabilizes hearing thresholds and preserves hearing.